A little structure. A clearer next step.

Competitor analysis

Compare a competitor with the customer's current workaround using facts you can inspect.

Free to use · No signup · Yours to keepRead the guide

Make it yours.

Start with what you know. Leave the rest open until you have evidence.

0 of 8 fields filledLoading your local draft…

Your answers stay in this browser. They are not sent to Soloop or synced between devices. Download a copy to keep it.

Preview & export

What decision is this comparison for?

Name the target customer, one competitor, the current workaround and review date. Keep each answer below split by alternative.

Example

Decision: broad project suite or focused handoff tool? Competitor: [name]. Workaround: shared document. Customer/date: [add].

0 / 12,000 characters

Who does each alternative serve?

Compare explicit customer fit and exclusions. Attach source/date and an evidence label to each finding.

Example

Competitor: [stated audience, source, date]. Workaround: [observed users, note, date]. Exclusions: unknown.

0 / 12,000 characters

What job and trigger does each address?

Describe the progress sought and the event that starts the work. Separate published promises from observed use.

Example

Competitor promises [job]. Workaround handles [current task]. Reason to switch now: not established.

0 / 12,000 characters

What proof can a buyer inspect?

Record official documentation, a dated demo or permissioned observation. Marketing claims and measured outcomes are different evidence.

Example

Competitor: [documentation URL and date]. Workaround: [recent artifact reference]. Customer outcomes: unknown.

0 / 12,000 characters

What must the customer contribute?

Compare price, setup, data access, approvals and behavior change. Date volatile facts and mark unverified costs unknown.

Example

Competitor: [published plan and date], setup effort unknown. Workaround: reported time [source]; no estimate yet.

0 / 12,000 characters

Where does each option become difficult?

Distinguish a verified limitation from a suspected gap. Include places where the current workaround is sufficient.

Example

Competitor limitation: [inspected evidence]. Workaround: easy to edit; ownership clarity still needs investigation.

0 / 12,000 characters

What weakens the opportunity?

Record the strongest contrary finding and missing evidence. A missing feature alone does not establish demand.

Example

The shared document may already solve this well. Switching willingness and the frequency of missed handoffs are unknown.

0 / 12,000 characters

What will you choose or test?

Make a provisional decision, name the evidence behind it and choose a check that could reverse it. Add owner/date.

Example

Test a narrower handoff position with a relevant user. Reverse if the existing workaround has no meaningful obstacle. Owner/date: [add].

0 / 12,000 characters

Read the guide

Back to answers

Your working document

A clear record of your thinking, ready to take with you.